SynthesisInternational journal of implant dentistry2024
Clinical performance of additively manufactured subperiosteal implants: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of implant dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immediate Loading of 5.2-mm Ultra-Short Implants Supporting Maxillary Overdentures in the Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prosthetic-Guided Pterygoid Anchorage for HUG® Subperiosteal Implants: A Technical Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Innovative design of a novel combined intraosseous-subperiosteal hybrid implant for severe atrophic edentulous dentition: a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Patient-Specific Subperiosteal Implants for Oral and Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review Across Indications, from Established Full-Arch Use to Emerging Single-Tooth and Oncologic Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Maintenance of Custom-Made Subperiosteal Implants: A Narrative Review of Indirect Evidence and Preliminary Clinical Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Novel Ti6Al4V Surface Treatment for Subperiosteal Dental Implants (Part II): Matrix Deposition and Osteogenic Markers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Treatment of Severe Atrophy with Juxta-Osseous Implants: A Systematic Review and Case Report.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- To Remove or Not Remove Non-Conventional Dental Implants? Eleven-Year Retrospective Study on Implant Outcomes.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Article
- Customized 3D-Printed Subperiosteal Titanium Implants for Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Atrophic Maxilla in Geriatric Patients: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Surgical Management of Severe Maxillary Atrophy Using Customized Subperiosteal Titanium Implants: Report of Two Clinical Cases With 42 Months of Follow-Up.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Influence of the design of modern subperiosteal multivectorial anchored Implants on success and survival in complex patient cases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating Techniques for Vertical Ridge Augmentation via Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessment of different treatment alternatives for patients with total maxillectomy.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025Article
- Indications and Complications of Subperiosteal Implants: Literature Review and Case Series.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Clinical Performance of Subperiosteal Implants in the Full-Arch Rehabilitation of Severely Resorbed Edentulous Jaws: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Graftless Solutions for Rehabilitation of Atrophied Maxilla - Zygomatic Versus Subperiosteal Implants - A Systematic Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Review
- Evaluation of treatment options for atrophic mandible under trauma forces: a 3D finite element analysis treatment options for atrophic mandible under trauma forces.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Novel Ti6Al4V Surface Treatment for Subperiosteal Dental Implants: Evaluation of Osteoblast-like Cell Proliferation and Osteogenic Response.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hybrid Biomechanical Design of Dental Implants: Integrating Solid and Gyroid Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattice Architectures for Optimized Stress Distribution.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Five-Year Comparative Study of Zygomatic and Subperiosteal Implants: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Treatment Strategies for Severe Maxillary Atrophy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to assess implant survival and complications rate of modern subperiosteal implants (CAD designed and additively manufactured).
methodsA systematic review was conducted using three electronic databases; Medline (Pubmed), Cochrane library, and SCOPUS, following the PRISMA statement recommendations to answer the PICO question: "In patients with bone atrophy (P), do additively manufactured subperiosteal implants (I), compared to subperiosteal implants manufactured following traditional approaches (c), present satisfactory implant survival and complication rates (O)? The study was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023424211). Included articles quality was assessed using the "NIH quality assessment tools".
resultsThirteen articles were finally selected (5 cohort studies and 8 case series), including 227 patients (121 female / 106 male; weighted mean age 62.4 years) and 227 implants. After a weighted mean follow-up time of 21.4 months, 97.8% of implants were in function (5 failures reported), 58 implants (25.6%) presented partial exposure, 12 patients (5.3%) suffered soft tissue or persistent infection. Fracture of the interim prosthesis was reported in 8 of the155 patients (5.2%) in which the use of a provisional prosthesis was reported. A great heterogeneity was found in terms of study design and methodological aspects. For this reason, a quantitative analysis followed by meta-analysis was not possible.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, modern additively manufactured subperiosteal implants presented a good survival in the short-time, but a noticeable number of soft-tissue related complications were reported. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical behavior in the medium- and long-term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.