Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38315293›Full record

ArticlePsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2024

Family functioning in students of health sciences in four Latin American countries: a study of the structure and factorial invariance of the FACES III scale. A cross-sectional study.

Lindsey W Vilca, Víctor Díaz-Narváez, Aracelis Calzadilla-Núñez, Claudia Arispe-Alburqueque, Susana Facio Arciniega, María Alejandra Orostegui, Herminia Castellón-Montenegro, Karina Santander, Claudio López-Labarca, Guiomar Hernández Álvarez and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lindsey W VilcaSouth American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8537-9149
Víctor Díaz-NarváezDepartamento de Investigaciones, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile. vicpadina@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-0415
Aracelis Calzadilla-NúñezDepartamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad Bernardo OHiggins, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-2563
Claudia Arispe-AlburquequeDepartamento de Investigaciones, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-4655
Susana Facio ArciniegaUniversidad Autónoma de Coahuila (Unidad Torreón), Facultad de Enfermería, Coahuila, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2260-1299
María Alejandra OrosteguiDepartamento de Enfermería, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2218-6734
Herminia Castellón-MontenegroUniversidad Metropolitana, Facultad de Enfermería, Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-8572
Karina SantanderDepartamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Atacama, Copiapó, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4097-382X
Claudio López-LabarcaDepartamento de Obstetricia y Puericultura, Universidad de Atacama, Copiapó, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9628-9432
Guiomar Hernández ÁlvarezUniversidad de Cartagena, Facultad de Enfermería, Cartagena, de Indias, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-0976
Shirley Fernández-AragónDepartamento de Enfermería, Corporación Universitaria Rafael Núñez, Cartagena, de Indias, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4213-3736
Luz Marina Alonso PalacioUniversidad del Norte, División de Ciencias de la Salud, Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7935-8042
Alejandro Reyes-ReyesDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Santo Tomás, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Comunicaciones, Concepción, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2404-0467
Marco Cervantes MendozaDivisión Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8567-0905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychometric studies of the FACES III scale in Spanish-speaking countries show a lack of agreement on the factorial structure of the scale. In addition, most of the studies have only performed exploratory analyses of its factorial structure.

objectiveThe objective of the present study was to confirm the structure and factorial invariance of the FACES III scale in nursing and obstetric students from Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico.

methodsA total of 3303 students from the four countries participated in this study (Colombia = 1559, Chile = 1224, Peru = 215, Mexico = 305).

resultsThe results of the study showed that the Bi-factor model presents the best-fit indexes to the data from Colombia, Chile, and Mexico, but not from Peru. In addition, it was found that this model showed evidence of being strictly invariant among the three countries in the sequence of the invariance models proposed: metric invariance (ΔRMSEA = .000), scalar (ΔRMSEA = .008), and strict (ΔRMSEA = .008). The bi-factor model also showed adequate reliability indexes in the three countries.

conclusionIt is concluded that the FACES III scale shows adequate psychometric performance under a bi-factor model in nursing and obstetric students from Colombia, Chile, and Mexico. The lack of fit of the model in Peru could be associated with the small sample size.

Indexed as

AdaptabilityCohesionConfirmatory factor analysisFACES IIIFactorial InvarianceFamily functioning

Identifiers

PMID38315293
PMCPMC10844165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.