Trial reportAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Differentiation of early relapse and late relapse in intermediate- and high-risk neuroblastoma with an
Trial report in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Prognosis of Neuroblastoma - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology reports · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate an
methodsA total of eighty-five patients with relapsed NB who underwent
resultsFinally, the 12 most important radiomics features were used for modeling, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.835 and 0.824 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Age at diagnosis and International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification were determined as clinical risk factors to construct the clinical model. In addition, the nomogram achieved an AUC of 0.902 and 0.889 for identifying early relapse in the training and validation sets, respectively, which is higher than the clinical model (AUC of 0.712 and 0.588, respectively). The predicted early relapse and actual early relapse in the calibration curves were in good agreement. The DCA showed that the radiomics nomogram was clinically useful.
conclusionOur
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.