Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38315126›Full record

Trial reportHepatology communications2024

Improved outcomes after hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion in liver transplantation-Long-term follow-up of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Zoltan Czigany, Deniz Uluk, Sandra Pavicevic, Isabella Lurje, Jiří Froněk, Theresa Keller, Pavel Strnad, Decan Jiang, Tom Gevers, Dionysios Koliogiannis and 13 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hepatology communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Zoltan CziganyDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0373-3210
Deniz UlukDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6395-0845
Sandra PavicevicDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6204-2466
Isabella LurjeDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4006-7707
Jiří FroněkDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2379-3886
Theresa KellerDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2687-6660
Pavel StrnadDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3164-9614
Decan JiangDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0535-9488
Tom GeversDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3070-8443
Dionysios KoliogiannisDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-8547
Markus GubaDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7778-8401
Rene H TolbaInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-3994
Franziska A MeisterDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9624-6042
Ulf P NeumannDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3831-8917
Matej KocikDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2730-9601
Marek KyselaDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1412-6830
Igor M SauerDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9355-937
Nathanael RaschzokDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5074-7063
Wenzel SchöningDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0446-5126
Irinel PopescuDepartment of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2897-1170
Frank TackeDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6206-0226
Johann PratschkeDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9839-1369
Georg LurjeDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9674-0756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile 4 randomized controlled clinical trials confirmed the early benefits of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE), high-level evidence regarding long-term clinical outcomes is lacking. The aim of this follow-up study from the HOPE-ECD-DBD trial was to compare long-term outcomes in patients who underwent liver transplantation using extended criteria donor allografts from donation after brain death (ECD-DBD), randomized to either HOPE or static cold storage (SCS).

methodsBetween September 2017 and September 2020, recipients of liver transplantation from 4 European centers receiving extended criteria donor-donation after brain death allografts were randomly assigned to HOPE or SCS (1:1). Follow-up data were available for all patients. Analyzed endpoints included the incidence of late-onset complications (occurring later than 6 months and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index) and long-term graft survival and patient survival.

resultsA total of 46 patients were randomized, 23 in both arms. The median follow-up was 48 months (95% CI: 41-55). After excluding early perioperative morbidity, a significant reduction in late-onset morbidity was observed in the HOPE group (median reduction of 23 Comprehensive Complication Index-points [p=0.003] and lower incidence of major complications [Clavien-Dindo ≥3, 43% vs. 85%, p=0.009]). Primary graft loss occurred in 13 patients (HOPE n=3 vs. SCS n=10), resulting in a significantly lower overall graft survival (p=0.029) and adverse 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities in the SCS group, which did not reach the level of significance (HOPE 0.913, 0.869, 0.869 vs. SCS 0.783, 0.606, 0.519, respectively).

conclusionsOur exploratory findings indicate that HOPE reduces late-onset morbidity and improves long-term graft survival providing clinical evidence to further support the broad implementation of HOPE in human liver transplantation.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationBrain DeathFollow-Up StudiesGraft SurvivalHumansPerfusion

Identifiers

PMID38315126
PMCPMC10843418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.