ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024
Culture-independent identification of bloodstream infections from whole blood: prospective evaluation in specimens of known infection status.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in screening, diagnosis, prognosis and personalized treatment of sepsis.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2026Review
- Clinical evaluation of multiplex pathogen real-time PCR for early detection of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes in intra-abdominal infections.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Direct-from-Blood Molecular Diagnostic Platform for Pathogen Detection in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Fast Microbiology: A Pilot Study Comparing Culture-Independent Digital PCR and Blood Culture for Pathogen Detection in Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Multiplex-PCR Identification of Positive Blood Cultures: Pathogen Epidemiology, Resistance Determinants, and the Economic and Interpretive Cost of Qualitative Rapid Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A review of bloodstream infections-pathogens, pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, treatment methods-challenges and future aspects.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Development and Diagnostic Validation of an Automated Rapid Testing Platform for Serum Lysophosphatidylcholine as a Sepsis Biomarker.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Plasma metagenomic cfDNA sequencing identifies pathogens in culture-negative sepsis following urinary pouch rupture.BMJ case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical and Economic Value of Rapid Microbiological Diagnostics in Bloodstream Infections: A State-of-the-Art Evidence Review with Emphasis on PCR and MALDI-TOF.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Peering Inside the Black Box: Explainable AI to Interpret Advanced Computer Vision Fungal Pathogen Prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Balancing Speed and Cost: Economic Insights from Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Bloodstream Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Complementary mNGS and traditional testing for bloodstream infections.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) and its modified version for early detection of central line-associated bloodstream infection: a pilot study using machine learning techniques.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2026Article
- Dynamic Profiling of Lipoteichoic Acid (LTA) and/or Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Positive Extracellular Vesicles in Plasma as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Bacterial Infection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- Performance of Early Sepsis Screening Tools for Timely Diagnosis and Antibiotic Stewardship in a Resource-Limited Thai Community Hospital.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The First Case of the Identification of a Microorganism Directly from Whole Blood Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry in an Onco-Hematological Pediatric Patient with Bloodstream Infection.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Early detection of central line-associated bloodstream infection in intensive care unit patients using the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI).GMS hygiene and infection control · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis caused by bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major healthcare burden and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Timely diagnosis is critical to optimize clinical outcome, as mortality rates rise every hour treatment is delayed. Blood culture remains the "gold standard" for diagnosis but is limited by its long turnaround time (1-7 days depending on the organism) and its potential to provide false-negative results due to interference by antimicrobial therapy or the presence of mixed (i.e., polymicrobial) infections. In this paper, we evaluated the performance of resistance and pathogen ID/BSI, a direct-from-specimen molecular assay. To reduce the false-positivity rate common with molecular methods, this assay isolates and detects genomic material only from viable microorganisms in the blood by incorporating a novel precursor step to selectively lyse host and non-viable microbial cells and remove cell-free genomic material prior to lysis and analysis of microbial cells. Here, we demonstrate that the assay is free of interference from host immune cells and common antimicrobial agents at elevated concentrations. We also demonstrate the accuracy of this technology in a prospective cohort pilot study of individuals with known sepsis/BSI status, including samples from both positive and negative individuals. IMPORTANCE: Blood culture remains the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of sepsis/bloodstream infection (BSI) but has many limitations which may lead to a delay in appropriate and accurate treatment in patients. Molecular diagnostic methods have the potential for markedly improving the management of such patients through faster turnaround times and increased accuracy. But molecular diagnostic methods have not been widely adopted for the identification of BSIs. By incorporating a precursor step of selective lysis of host and non-viable microorganisms, our resistance and pathogen ID (RaPID)/BSI molecular assay addresses many limitations of blood culture and other molecular assay. The RaPID/BSI assay has an approximate turnaround time of 4 hours, thereby significantly reducing the time to appropriate and accurate diagnosis of causative microorganisms in such patients. The short turnaround time also allows for close to real-time tracking of pathogenic clearance of microorganisms from the blood of these patients or if a change of antimicrobial regimen is required. Thus, the RaPID/BSI molecular assay helps with optimization of antimicrobial stewardship; prompt and accurate diagnosis of sepsis/BSI could help target timely treatment and reduce mortality and morbidity in such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.