ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
ChIP-GPT: a managed large language model for robust data extraction from biomedical database records.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unveiling the Potential of Large Language Models in Transforming Chronic Disease Management: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- ELISA (Embedding-Linked Interactive Single-cell Agent): an interpretable hybrid generative Artificial Intelligence agent for expression-grounded discovery in single-cell genomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- CistromeMeta: a large language model powered tool for automated ChIP-seq metadata extraction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Metappuccino: large language model-driven reconstruction of sequence read archive metadata for cancer research.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Enhanced semantic classification of microbiome sample origins using large language models (LLMs).GigaScience · 2026Article
- Assessing data extraction in randomized clinical trials with large language models.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Extraction of biological terms using large language models enhances the usability of metadata in the BioSample database.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Steering veridical large language model analyses by correcting and enriching generated database queries: first steps toward ChatGPT bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing volumes of biomedical data are amassing in databases. Large-scale analyses of these data have wide-ranging applications in biology and medicine. Such analyses require tools to characterize and process entries at scale. However, existing tools, mainly centered on extracting predefined fields, often fail to comprehensively process database entries or correct evident errors-a task humans can easily perform. These tools also lack the ability to reason like domain experts, hindering their robustness and analytical depth. Recent advances with large language models (LLMs) provide a fundamentally new way to query databases. But while a tool such as ChatGPT is adept at answering questions about manually input records, challenges arise when scaling up this process. First, interactions with the LLM need to be automated. Second, limitations on input length may require a record pruning or summarization pre-processing step. Third, to behave reliably as desired, the LLM needs either well-designed, short, 'few-shot' examples, or fine-tuning based on a larger set of well-curated examples. Here, we report ChIP-GPT, based on fine-tuning of the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) model Llama and on a program prompting the model iteratively and handling its generation of answer text. This model is designed to extract metadata from the Sequence Read Archive, emphasizing the identification of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) targets and cell lines. When trained with 100 examples, ChIP-GPT demonstrates 90-94% accuracy. Notably, it can seamlessly extract data from records with typos or absent field labels. Our proposed method is easily adaptable to customized questions and different databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.