Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38314589›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2024

Fractionating difficulty during sentence comprehension using functional neuroimaging.

Malathi Thothathiri, Jana Basnakova, Ashley G Lewis, Josephine M Briand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malathi ThothathiriDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Jana BasnakovaRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ashley G LewisRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4737-2525
Josephine M BriandDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

Cognitive control and sentence processing in aphasiaR01DC017138 · NIDCD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI THOTHATHIRI, MALATHI · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Prisma Upgrade for a Siemens 3T MRI ScannerS10OD023561 · OD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI VANMETER, ASHLEY S · 2017 to 2017
$1.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017138NIH HHS R01DC017138NIH HHS S10 OD023561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentence comprehension is highly practiced and largely automatic, but this belies the complexity of the underlying processes. We used functional neuroimaging to investigate garden-path sentences that cause difficulty during comprehension, in order to unpack the different processes used to support sentence interpretation. By investigating garden-path and other types of sentences within the same individuals, we functionally profiled different regions within the temporal and frontal cortices in the left hemisphere. The results revealed that different aspects of comprehension difficulty are handled by left posterior temporal, left anterior temporal, ventral left frontal, and dorsal left frontal cortices. The functional profiles of these regions likely lie along a spectrum of specificity to generality, including language-specific processing of linguistic representations, more general conflict resolution processes operating over linguistic representations, and processes for handling difficulty in general. These findings suggest that difficulty is not unitary and that there is a role for a variety of linguistic and non-linguistic processes in supporting comprehension.

Indexed as

ComprehensionMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain MappingFunctional NeuroimagingHumansLanguageLinguisticsattentioncognitive controlleft frontal cortexsyntactic ambiguityworking memory

Identifiers

PMID38314589
PMCPMC10847905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.