ArticleCirculation2024
Pediatric ECG-Based Deep Learning to Predict Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Remodeling.
Article in Circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multitask Deep Learning Model for Pediatric Echocardiography Analysis.Circulation · 2026Article
- Beyond Accuracy: Defining the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Electrocardiography.Indian pediatrics · 2026Article
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Congenital Heart Disease Using Artificial Intelligence.Circulation · 2026Article
- Current concepts and challenges in pediatric diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Flexible wearable medical devices: from material innovations and data processing to intelligent healthcare applications.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Review
- Comparative evaluation of multimodal large language models for diagnostic accuracy in pediatric electrocardiography: a prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development and multicentre validation of an artificial intelligence electrocardiogram model for ventricular remodeling in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled ECG to Detect Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Multicenter validation of AI-enabled ECG for pediatric biological sex prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Electrocardiogram Analysis for Age and Sex Classification in Youth.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Echocardiographic Measurements in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Congenital Heart Disease Using Artificial Intelligence.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Robust AI-ECG for Predicting Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Tools in Myocardial Infarction Prognosis: Evaluating the Performance of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Deep survival analysis from adult and pediatric electrocardiograms: a multi-center benchmark study.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Infant Electrocardiogram-Based Deep Learning Predicts Critical Congenital Heart Disease.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2025Article
- A Multi-Task Deep Learning Model for Pediatric Echocardiography Analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- A foundational architecture for AI agents in healthcare.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Electrocardiogram Analysis for Age and Sex Classification in Youth.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence-enhanced ECG analysis shows promise to detect ventricular dysfunction and remodeling in adult populations. However, its application to pediatric populations remains underexplored.
methodsA convolutional neural network was trained on paired ECG-echocardiograms (≤2 days apart) from patients ≤18 years of age without major congenital heart disease to detect human expert-classified greater than mild left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, hypertrophy, and dilation (individually and as a composite outcome). Model performance was evaluated on single ECG-echocardiogram pairs per patient at Boston Children's Hospital and externally at Mount Sinai Hospital using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).
resultsThe training cohort comprised 92 377 ECG-echocardiogram pairs (46 261 patients; median age, 8.2 years). Test groups included internal testing (12 631 patients; median age, 8.8 years; 4.6% composite outcomes), emergency department (2830 patients; median age, 7.7 years; 10.0% composite outcomes), and external validation (5088 patients; median age, 4.3 years; 6.1% composite outcomes) cohorts. Model performance was similar on internal test and emergency department cohorts, with model predictions of LV hypertrophy outperforming the pediatric cardiologist expert benchmark. Adding age and sex to the model added no benefit to model performance. When using quantitative outcome cutoffs, model performance was similar between internal testing (composite outcome: AUROC, 0.88, AUPRC, 0.43; LV dysfunction: AUROC, 0.92, AUPRC, 0.23; LV hypertrophy: AUROC, 0.88, AUPRC, 0.28; LV dilation: AUROC, 0.91, AUPRC, 0.47) and external validation (composite outcome: AUROC, 0.86, AUPRC, 0.39; LV dysfunction: AUROC, 0.94, AUPRC, 0.32; LV hypertrophy: AUROC, 0.84, AUPRC, 0.25; LV dilation: AUROC, 0.87, AUPRC, 0.33), with composite outcome negative predictive values of 99.0% and 99.2%, respectively. Saliency mapping highlighted ECG components that influenced model predictions (precordial QRS complexes for all outcomes; T waves for LV dysfunction). High-risk ECG features include lateral T-wave inversion (LV dysfunction), deep S waves in V1 and V2 and tall R waves in V6 (LV hypertrophy), and tall R waves in V4 through V6 (LV dilation).
conclusionsThis externally validated algorithm shows promise to inexpensively screen for LV dysfunction and remodeling in children, which may facilitate improved access to care by democratizing the expertise of pediatric cardiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.