Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38314556›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2024

The Method of Portal Making in Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery with Different Operative Approaches According to the Constant Anatomical Landmarks of the Lumbar Spine: A Review of the Literature.

Yixi Wang, Abulikemu Maimaiti, Abudusalamu Tuoheti, Yang Xiao, Rui Zhang, Alafate Kahaer, Dongshan Liu, Paerhati Rexiti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yixi WangFirst Clinical Medical College, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9310-7883
Abulikemu MaimaitiDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Abudusalamu TuohetiDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yang XiaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Alafate KahaerDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0181-9806
Dongshan LiuDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Paerhati RexitiDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5889-0179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designReview.

objectiveUnilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE) is a minimally invasive surgery that is gaining recognition and being employed in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the precise method for determining UBE portals' location varies depending on the originator's preferences or the anatomical structure's proximity to the portal positions. Consequently, the relationship among UBE portals' locations is messy. This study aims to elaborate on the specific portal localization and explore the positional association and commonality among different UBE approaches' portals.

methodsThe following keywords are used to search in the PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang database: "Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery", "Two portal endoscopic spinal surgery", "Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression", "Unilateral biportal endoscopy", "Irrigation endoscopic discectomy", "UBE" and "BESS".

resultsAfter screening, 29 pieces of literature are included. The study summarizes different UBE approach portal localizations, categorized by fusion or non-fusion surgery and pathological classification. The study presents an inaugural method for categorizing the lumber into four surgical intervals based on bone landmarks and assigns different UBE approaches to the appropriate intervals based on their characteristics, making the selection of UBE surgical approaches' portal locations more flexible. Additionally, the study provides an overview of the indications, complications, and distinct benefits associated with each interval, further refining the novel UBE portal interval localization method.

conclusionThe study clarifies the interrelationship and commonality between the portals of different UBE approaches and proposes a new UBE portal interval localization method to enhance surgeons' understanding and proficiency in UBE procedures.

Indexed as

anatomical landmarksincisionlumbar spineportal makingunilateral biportal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38314556
PMCPMC11268301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.