ArticleCureus2024
Clinical Profile, Antibiotic Resistance and Outcomes in Bacterial Endophthalmitis: Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Endophthalmitis as Compared to Other Organisms.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the clinical profile, outcomes and antibiotic resistance in bacterial endophthalmitis.
methodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of a study conducted at a tertiary centre, where 60 consecutive cases of culture-proven bacterial endophthalmitis were included prospectively. Group 1 included coagulase-negative Staphylococcus endophthalmitis (CNSE), while group 2 included the remaining cases. Clinical features, antibiotic resistance and visual outcomes were compared. Visual acuity >3/60 at six months of follow-up was defined as a good visual outcome.
resultsGroup 1 had 31 cases, while group 2 had 29. Group 2 included 12 gram-positive and 17 gram-negative isolates. Among the groups, group 2 had more patients with presenting visual acuity below hand motions close to the face (25 vs. 12, p<0.001), poor visual outcomes (26 vs. 3, p<0.001) and retinal detachment (RD) (10 vs. 2, p=0.007). Pseudomonas was most commonly resistant to antibiotics, and ceftazidime (p=0.005) and cefazolin (p=0.009) resistance were higher in group 2 isolates. In group 1, five isolates were resistant to any one of the antibiotics, whereas in group 2, 13 isolates were resistant to any one of the antibiotics (p=0.024).
conclusionsIn the current study, eyes in the group of endophthalmitis caused by CNSE achieved better visual acuities at the last follow-up compared to eyes with endophthalmitis caused by other bacteria. Antibiotic resistance in isolates other than CNSE is a cause of concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.