ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Effect of Milling Speed on the Properties of Zirconia Restorations.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of a Regression Model for Creating Surface Microgeometry after Machining Zirconia YML Used for Dental Application.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of milling speed on the surface roughness, marginal gap, marginal gap volume, marginal offset, and fracture load of zirconia restorations. Material and Methods: A mandibular molar #30 typodont tooth was digitally scanned and an ideal crown preparation for a zirconia restoration was digitally created. A single master model die of the crown preparation was milled out of a resin material. The master die was scanned, and a final restoration was designed using the bio-copy feature of the typodont tooth. Ten zirconia restorations were milled (CEREC Primemill, Dentsply Sirona) per each of three milling speeds (super-fast, fine, and extra-fine), sintered, and seated on the master die. Surface roughness, marginal gap, marginal gap volume, and marginal offset were measured using a non-contact profilometer. Then, all restorations were cemented to the dies and loaded to failure in a material testing device. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests per property (alpha=0.05). Results: Super-fast milling speed resulted in restorations with statistically significant greater surface roughness and marginal gap volume compared to fine and extra-fine milling speeds. No significant difference in marginal gap, marginal offset, and fracture load were found based on milling speed. Conclusions: Zirconia restorations milled at slower speeds may result in similar or slightly better properties compared to super-fast speed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.