Article in ZooKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Varat SivayyapramCenter of Excellence in Entomology and Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-0270
Chawakorn KunseteCenter of Excellence in Entomology and Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand.
Deborah R SmithDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Haworth Hall, 1200 Sunnyside Avenue, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA University of Kansas Lawrence United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2581-5009
Prapun TraiyasutProgram in Biology, Faculty of Science, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University Ubon Ratchathani Thailand.
Sureerat DeowanishCenter of Excellence in Entomology and Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand.
Mu Mu AungForest Research Institute, Forest Department, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation Nay Pyi Taw Myanmar.
Hirotsugu OnoDepartment of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0005, Japan National Museum of Nature and Science Tsukuba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8568-4549
Natapot WarritCenter of Excellence in Entomology and Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-1782
Chulalongkorn University · THHubei University · CNHunan Normal University · CNKaohsiung Medical University · TWMinistry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation · MMNational Museum of Nature and Science · JPUbon Ratchathani Rajabhat University · THUniversity of Kansas · US
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Seven new species of the primitive segmented spider genus
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Seven new species of the segmented spider genus · full record | OpenQuestion