Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38314084›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

A scoping review on chordee correction in boys with ventral congenital penile curvature and hypospadias.

Priyank Yadav, Adam Bobrowski, Ihtisham Ahmad, Jin Kyu Kim, Margarita Chancy, Dheidan Alshammari, Mandy Rickard, Armando J Lorenzo, Darius Bagli, Michael E Chua

Open access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Priyank YadavDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adam BobrowskiDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ihtisham AhmadDepartment of Undergraduate Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jin Kyu KimDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Margarita ChancyDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dheidan AlshammariDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mandy RickardDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Armando J LorenzoDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Darius BagliDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael E ChuaDivision of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CASickKids Foundation · CASanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Congenital penile curvature (PC), often concomitant with hypospadias, poses challenges in urology. Surgical correction techniques, including plication and corporotomy, lack standardized guidelines. This study aims to address the paucity of high-level evidence by comprehensively reviewing the outcomes of PC correction procedures in patients with and without hypospadias. This will inform clinical decision-making and provide insights for future research and meta-analyses. Methods: We conducted this scoping review in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. An extensive literature search was performed and comparative studies published in English up to June 2023 were included. The studies were divided into three categories: PC without hypospadias, PC with hypospadias, and studies comparing two or more materials for covering the ventral corporotomy. Data extraction comprised author details, patient characteristics, study design, interventions, outcomes, and complications. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Forty-two studies were included in the review, which collectively comprised 3180 patients. Thirteen comparative studies reported the outcomes of surgery for congenital PC without hypospadias, 22 studies compared different techniques of PC correction in patients with hypospadias and 7 studies compared the type of materials for coverage following ventral corporotomy. In cases of PC without hypospadias, the most commonly reported surgery was the Nesbit's plication. For PC with hypospadias correction, the results of ventral corporotomy were superior to that of dorsal plication in most of the studies. The two-stage repair had better results when compared to the one-stage repair for patients with perineo-scrotal hypospadias. In studies comparing materials for coverage of ventral corporotomy, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft was utilized most commonly. The majority of the studies reported a success rate ranging from 85% to 100%. The methodological quality was high in all but four studies. Conclusion: Plication procedures are generally preferred for PC without hypospadias, but they result in penile shortening. For those with hypospadias, corporotomy is associated with superior outcomes than plication, especially for those with severe curvature and redo procedures. For ventral corporotomy coverage, the tunica vaginalis flap or graft is the most commonly reported tissue in the literature.

Identifiers

PMID38314084
PMCPMC10836453
OpenAlexW4390405121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.