Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38314074›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Evaluation of a novel augmented reality educational tool and its effects on patient experience: A randomized controlled trial.

Caroline A Miller, Rachel A Locke, Hailey W Holck, Holt J Evans, Tiag P Bhamber, Alexander L Sinks, Lila G McGrath, Danielle M Boselli, Peter E Clark, Ornob P Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caroline A MillerUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Rachel A LockeDepartment of Urology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Hailey W HolckUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Holt J EvansEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Spartanburg, South Carolina, USA.
Tiag P BhamberUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Alexander L SinksWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Lila G McGrathDepartment of Urology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Danielle M BoselliDepartment of Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Peter E ClarkDepartment of Urology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Ornob P RoyDepartment of Urology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient education is an essential element of the treatment pathway. Augmented reality (AR), with disease simulations and three-dimensional visuals, offers a developing approach to patient education. We aim to determine whether this tool can increase patient understanding of their disease and post-visit satisfaction in comparison to current standard of care (SOC) educational practices in a randomized control study. Methods: Our single-site study consisted of 100 patients with initial diagnoses of kidney masses or stones randomly enrolled in the AR or SOC arm. In the AR arm, a physician used AR software on a tablet to educate the patient. SOC patients were educated through traditional discussion, imaging, and hand-drawn illustrations. Participants completed pre- and post-physician encounter surveys adapted from the Press Ganey Results: There was no significant difference in participant education level ( Conclusions: While AR did not significantly increase self-reported patient understanding of their disease compared to SOC, this study suggests AR as a potential avenue to increase patient satisfaction with educational tools used during consultations.

Identifiers

PMID38314074
PMCPMC10836458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.