Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38314054›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2024

Towards a better tomorrow: addressing intersectional gender power relations to eradicate inequities in maternal health.

Meghan A Bohren, Aditi Iyer, Aluisio J D Barros, Caitlin R Williams, Alya Hazfiarini, Luisa Arroyave, Veronique Filippi, Catherine Chamberlain, Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian, Kaveri Mayra and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nothing About Us Without Us: Consolidating Experiences of Maternity Care to Advance Equity.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. FIGO call to action: Multisectoral approach to postpartum hemorrhage.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Meghan A BohrenGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Aditi IyerRamalingaswami Centre on Equity & Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Caitlin R WilliamsDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alya HazfiariniGender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Luisa ArroyaveInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Veronique FilippiLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine ChamberlainIndigenous Health Equity Unit, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Tamar Kabakian-KhasholianDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Kaveri MayraBirth Place Lab, Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Roopan GillDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua P VogelMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Doris ChouUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Asha S GeorgeSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, Western Cape, South Africa.
Olufemi T OladapoUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An equity lens to maternal health has typically focused on assessing the differences in coverage and use of healthcare services and critical interventions. While this approach is important, we argue that healthcare experiences, dignity, rights, justice, and well-being are fundamental components of high quality and person-centred maternal healthcare that must also be considered. Looking at differences across one dimension alone does not reflect how fundamental drivers of maternal health inequities-including racism, ethnic or caste-based discrimination, and gendered power relations-operate. In this paper, we describe how using an intersectionality approach to maternal health can illuminate how power and privilege (and conversely oppression and exclusion) intersect and drive inequities. We present an intersectionality-informed analysis on antenatal care quality to illustrate the advantages of this approach, and what is lost in its absence. We reviewed and mapped equity-informed interventions in maternal health to existing literature to identify opportunities for improvement and areas for innovation. The gaps and opportunities identified were then synthesised to propose recommendations on how to apply an intersectionality lens to maternal health research, programmes, and policies.

Indexed as

Health equity and justiceIntersectionalityMaternal healthQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID38314054
PMCPMC10837533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.