Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38314015›Full record

ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2024

Ultrasound for suspected Baker's cyst: A test of limited clinical value?

Mark Charnock, Matthew Kinsella, Annu Chopra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark CharnockSheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-147X
Matthew KinsellaBarnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK.
Annu ChopraSheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Northern General Hospital · GBBarnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with posterior knee swellings are commonly encountered in clinical practice with the vast majority referred for an ultrasound scan to assess for a clinically suspected Baker's cyst. Aims: Our aim was to determine the incidence of different pathologies in patients investigated for a posterior knee swelling of a clinically suspected Baker's cyst using ultrasound. We also wanted to investigate the incidence of significant pathologies in the popliteal fossa to assess whether the ultrasound scan findings influenced patient management. Methodology: Retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent an ultrasound scan for a suspected Baker's cyst or posterior knee swelling at our institution, between January 2017 and December 2018. Patient demographics, ultrasound findings, further imaging investigations and histopathology were recorded. Patient records were followed up for a minimum period of 3 years after ultrasound. Results: A total of 680 patients had a posterior knee ultrasound scan. Of that, 51% (347/680) had a Baker's cyst and 40% (273/680) had a normal ultrasound scan. Sixty (9%) patients had other abnormalities identified within the popliteal fossa. Four patients had significant findings on ultrasound that required a change of management. No malignancies identified. Conclusion: This study confirms the high incidence of Baker's cysts in patients presenting with a posterior knee swelling. In the absence of red flag symptoms, ultrasound of the posterior knee for a clinically suspected Baker's cyst is of limited clinical value.

Indexed as

Baker’s cystkneemusculoskeletalUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38314015
PMCPMC10836229
OpenAlexW4384298423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.