ArticleCureus2024
Quality of Life Assessment in Women With Breast Cancer in Nineveh, Iraq.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coping skills and associated sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors among women with breast cancer in Iraq: a cross-sectional study".BMC public health · 2025Article
- Quality of Life and Its Associated Factors Among Breast Cancer Women in Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Due to earlier detection and improved treatment and examinations, there has been a rise in the survival rate of patients with breast cancer (BC). It is imperative to examine the health-related quality of life (QoL) of these patients, as it can aid healthcare professionals and authorities in comprehending the variables that influence quality of life. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of information on the subject of women in Nineveh. In Nineveh, a study sought to delve into the quality of life experienced by women undergoing treatment or on follow-up for breast cancer at Mosul Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Hospital. Specifically, researchers wanted to see how age and treatment impacted the QoL of these women. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 212 women with BC. Clinico-pathological-, social-, disease-, and treatment-related characteristics were reviewed. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire was used for assessing QoL in this study. Results The overall FACT-B score was 75.7 (SD=19.99). Around 36.3% (n=77) of women with BC suffered from a lack of energy, and 39% (n=83) could not meet the needs of their families. The mean score of emotional well-being was the lowest among the FACT-B subscales. Patients aged 60 years and older had significantly worse QoL than younger patients (less than 60 years), and patients receiving chemotherapy had poor QoL. During the chemotherapy period, 51.4% (n=77) of patients were bothered by the side effects of treatment; 43.8% (n=65) suffered from pain; 35.3% (n=53) had nausea; and 39.1% (n=58) felt ill. Conclusions Patients with breast carcinoma who are older tend to experience a lower quality of life, according to the findings of a recent study. Interestingly, those who undergo systemic chemotherapy have a worse QoL than their counterparts who complete their chemotherapy cycles. As a result, healthcare providers must offer targeted interventions to improve quality of life, particularly for those who fall into the older age group and those receiving chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.