ArticleCureus2024
A Study of Sensory Nerve Conduction in Pre- and Post-immunoglobulin Treatment of Guillain-Barré Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a condition characterized by acute and progressive weakness that impacts the limbs, facial muscles, and bulbar muscles due to acute polyneuro-radiculopathy. Typically, an infection that results in immune-mediated nerve dysfunction is what starts the disease. Patients often encounter paresthesia or discomfort before progressing to muscle weakness, initially in the lower extremities (which may include some proximal components) and subsequently in the upper extremities. The features of polyneuropathy identified during electrophysiology tests, bolstered by evidence of acquired demyelination in the nerve conduction study (NCS), support the clinical diagnosis of GBS. In peripheral neuropathies, NCS often reveals abnormalities in nerve conduction parameters. A specific pattern observed in the sensory nerve conduction study (SNCS), referred to as "sural sparing," signifies that the sural nerve, located near the calf muscles, remains relatively unaffected compared to other sensory nerves. Very few studies have been conducted to investigate improvements in sensory nerve conduction (SNC) parameters before and after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), offering limited clinical correlation for the recovery and prognosis of the disease. The study aimed to observe the NCS parameters of the sensory nerves in both the upper and lower limbs, before and after the infusion of IVIG. METHODOLOGY: This study was an observational investigation conducted in the neurophysiology laboratory of the Physiology Department at a rural medical college in central India. Fifty clinically diagnosed cases of GBS aged between 18 and 60 years were referred from the Department of Medicine to the Physiology Department for conducting the NCS. Basic sociodemographic information, along with clinical history, was collected. Subsequently, the RMS EMG EP Mark-II machine was employed to examine the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs), such as amplitude (in mV) and conduction velocity (in ms), of the sensory nerves in both the upper and lower limbs before and after IVIG infusion. The IVIG infusion occurs within one week of clinically diagnosing GBS. Following an initial NCS, a second NCS follow-up study was conducted one week after the IVIG infusion to analyze the changing trend in sensory nerves.
resultsUpon analysis, no significant correlation was observed between the pre- and post-IVIG SNAPs of the median and ulnar nerves. However, the sural nerve conduction velocity's p-value of 0.033 demonstrated statistical significance, suggesting that the sural nerve is comparatively spared, confirming sural sparing. However, the SNAP of the sensory nerves in GBS patients showed a significant improvement overall, and only NCS quantified the percentage of improvement.
conclusionAccording to the study, the NCS of sensory nerves showed a positive change in the parameters examined before and after the infusion of IVIG. This underscores the timely intervention of GBS with IVIG, and conducting the sensory conduction study diligently will enhance knowledge about the recovery period. Additionally, it supports the treating physician in making informed interventions based on the results post-IVIG infusion. This enhancement in the sensory nerves can only be quantified through NCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.