ArticleACS omega2024
Computational Approach to Elucidating Insulin-Protamine Binding Interactions and Dynamics in Insulin NPH Formulations.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design of Electrostatic Nanocomplex of Semaglutide with Protamine and Zinc for Subcutaneous Prolonged Delivery.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insulin NPH is an intermediate-acting insulin. Its protracted action profile is due to the formation of microcrystalline suspensions when insulin is complexed with a basic peptide protamine, zinc ion, and phenolic ligands. Despite advancements in analytical techniques, the binding epitope and binding mode of the protamine in the insulin-protamine complex are still unknown. In this study, we used bioinformatics tools such as molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to compute the binding sites and energetics of the insulin-protamine complex. We have taken four naturally occurring protamine peptides that are independently docked with the insulin R6 hexamer and subjected them to 200 ns MD simulations to observe the dynamics of the complexes and estimate the binding energies. The arginine-rich protamine peptides were found to bind on the surface of the insulin hexamer through hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, and electrostatic interactions well supported by the calculated negative binding energies. The overall structure of the insulin hexamer was retained upon binding, highlighting its dynamic stability in the complex. Furthermore, the residues at the termini of the protamine peptides in the complex were seen to be highly dynamic, which stabilize toward the end of the simulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.