ArticleACS omega2024
Comparison of Toughening Effects of Various Additives on Phenolic Foam.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preparation, Properties and Chemical Modification Methods of the Fire-Fighting Foam for Coal Spontaneous Combustion.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Phenolic Foam Preparation Using Hydrofluoroolefin Blowing Agents and the Toughening Effect of Polyethylene Glycol.Polymers · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phenolic foams (PFs) are considered excellent insulation materials owing to their flame retardancy and low thermal conductivity. However, their mechanical properties often lag behind those of other polymeric insulation materials. To fully exploit their properties and broaden end-use applications, the mechanical properties of PFs must be enhanced. In this study, various modifications were introduced into the PF matrix with the aim of enhancing its properties. The toughening effects of four additives: urea (U), nano clay (NC), sodium silicate (SS), and lignin (Li) were studied and compared. Changes that occurred in the density, cell morphology, thermal conductivity, compressive strength, and thermal stability after the addition of these fillers were analyzed. Both compressive strength and thermal stability increased with the inclusion of all additives, and the SS-toughened foam shows the biggest improvement. Li and NC addition resulted in a 34% improvement in compressive strength, while SS and U addition displayed increases of 52 and 11%, respectively. SS-toughened PF shows greater improvements in all of the important properties compared with those of the other toughened foams. Several PFs were prepared by changing the SS concentration to optimize the formulation, which yielded improvements in properties. The effects of SS concentration on density, thermal conductivity, and compressive strength were studied. The formulation with 0.37% sodium silicate concentration (PF-SS1) shows a 15% improvement in mechanical properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.