ArticleACS omega2024
A Highly Sensitive Surface-Modified Porous Carbon Nanotube-Based Sensor for Ammonia Gas Detection.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon Nanotube-Based Gas Sensors: Sensing Mechanisms, Functional Interfaces, Gas-Specific Performance, and Flexible/Wearable Integration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hazardous gas adsorption and sensing by pristine and Pd/Mo-decorated TiSRSC advances · 2025Article
- To study the performance of polyaniline-based copper and carbon-nanotube (PANI@Cu@CNT) nanocomposite for harmful NHScientific reports · 2025Article
- High-Performance NHACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we compared the gas sensing behaviors of pristine and decorated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and examined the response behavior of bare and adorned MWCNTs in gas sensing. According to the data, the decorated response was 144%, which is higher than the bare CNT response of 117% in terms of the sensing response. The RF-sputtering method is used to decorate the carbon nanotubes by pure Indium (In) metal nanoparticles. Every measurement was performed in a temperature-controlled environment. Tests of the entire procedure were conducted at a 10 ppm concentration of ammonia gas. We have observed the quick reaction time (1-10 s) in pristine and (1-7 s) in decorated MWCNTs. The response was obtained 117% for the pristine and 144, 115, and 73% for the second (3 min decoration), third (6 min decoration), and fourth (9 min decoration) MWCNTs, respectively. The as-prepared pristine samples and all the decorated sensors had sensitivity values of 0.45, 0.50, 0.51, and 0.57 for time intervals of 0, 3, 6, and 9 min, respectively. It amounted to 45% for the pure and 50, 51, and 57% for the remaining as-prepared decorated sensors, respectively. Based on the measured sensor response graph, a recovery of between 80 and 85% was achieved. For a period of 10 days at a constant concentration, the stability was also assessed and we have analyzed the structural, electrical, and elemental composition of the prepared CNTs by FESEM, EDX, Raman spectroscopy, FTIR, and XRD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.