Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313476›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

A Highly Sensitive Surface-Modified Porous Carbon Nanotube-Based Sensor for Ammonia Gas Detection.

Shah Masheerul Aalam, Mohd Sarvar, Mohd Sadiq, Javid Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High-Performance NHACS omega · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shah Masheerul AalamMaterial Science Lab, Department of Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Mohd SarvarMaterial Science Lab, Department of Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Mohd SadiqMaterial Science Lab, Department of Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Javid AliMaterial Science Lab, Department of Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8042-8733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we compared the gas sensing behaviors of pristine and decorated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and examined the response behavior of bare and adorned MWCNTs in gas sensing. According to the data, the decorated response was 144%, which is higher than the bare CNT response of 117% in terms of the sensing response. The RF-sputtering method is used to decorate the carbon nanotubes by pure Indium (In) metal nanoparticles. Every measurement was performed in a temperature-controlled environment. Tests of the entire procedure were conducted at a 10 ppm concentration of ammonia gas. We have observed the quick reaction time (1-10 s) in pristine and (1-7 s) in decorated MWCNTs. The response was obtained 117% for the pristine and 144, 115, and 73% for the second (3 min decoration), third (6 min decoration), and fourth (9 min decoration) MWCNTs, respectively. The as-prepared pristine samples and all the decorated sensors had sensitivity values of 0.45, 0.50, 0.51, and 0.57 for time intervals of 0, 3, 6, and 9 min, respectively. It amounted to 45% for the pure and 50, 51, and 57% for the remaining as-prepared decorated sensors, respectively. Based on the measured sensor response graph, a recovery of between 80 and 85% was achieved. For a period of 10 days at a constant concentration, the stability was also assessed and we have analyzed the structural, electrical, and elemental composition of the prepared CNTs by FESEM, EDX, Raman spectroscopy, FTIR, and XRD.

Identifiers

PMID38313476
PMCPMC10832003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.