Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313452›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024

Anti-inflammatory response-based risk assessment in acute type A aortic dissection: A national multicenter cohort study.

Hong Liu, Bing-Qi Sun, Zhi-Wei Tang, Si-Chong Qian, Si-Qiang Zheng, Qing-Yuan Wang, Yong-Feng Shao, Jun-Quan Chen, Ji-Nong Yang, Yi Ding and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Hong LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China.
Bing-Qi SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Teda International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin 300457 PR China.
Zhi-Wei TangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China.
Si-Chong QianDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, PR China.
Si-Qiang ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200433, PR China.
Qing-Yuan WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China.
Yong-Feng ShaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China.
Jun-Quan ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300222, PR China.
Ji-Nong YangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, PR China.
Yi DingDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China.
Hong-Jia ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, PR China.
China Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy (5A) Investigators
Nanjing Medical University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNBeijing Anzhen Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNTEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early identification of patients at high risk of operative mortality is important for acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD). We aimed to investigate whether patients with distinct risk stratifications respond differently to anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy. Methods: From 13 cardiovascular hospitals, 3110 surgically repaired TAAD patients were randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%) to develop and validate a risk model to predict operative mortality using extreme gradient boosting. Performance was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Subgroup analyses were performed by risk stratifications (low versus middle-high risk) and anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy (absence versus presence of ulinastatin use). Results: A simplified risk model was developed for predicting operative mortality, consisting of the top ten features of importance: platelet-leukocyte ratio, D-dimer, activated partial thromboplastin time, urea nitrogen, glucose, lactate, base excess, hemoglobin, albumin, and creatine kinase-MB, which displayed a superior discrimination ability (AUC: 0.943, 95 % CI 0.928-0.958 and 0.884, 95 % CI 0.836-0.932) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Ulinastatin use was not associated with decreased risk of operative mortality among each risk stratification, however, ulinastatin use was associated with a shorter mechanical ventilation duration among patients with middle-high risk (defined as risk probability >5.0 %) (β -1.6 h, 95 % CI [-3.1, -0.1] hours; P = 0.048). Conclusion: This risk model reflecting inflammatory, coagulation, and metabolic pathways achieved acceptable predictive performances of operative mortality following TAAD surgery, which will contribute to individualized anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

Extreme gradient boostingMachine learningOperative mortalityType A aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID38313452
PMCPMC10835346
OpenAlexW4391116706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.