ArticleWorld journal of cardiology2024
Left bundle branch pacing
Article in World journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left bundle branch area pacing vs. biventricular pacing significantly improves clinical outcomes and cardiac remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Left bundle branch area pacing decreased the pressure gradient and severity of tricuspid regurgitation compared with right ventricular pacing.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Cost-Utility Analysis of Left Bundle Branch Area Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Multicenter, Prospective, Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Feasibility of totally leadless left bundle branch area pacing via a left endocardial pacing electrode in patients with heart failure: A 3-case series.HeartRhythm case reports · 2025Article
- Observational
- Sex Specific Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure Having Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.American journal of medicine open · 2025Review
- Left bundle branch pacing cardiac resynchronization therapyWorld journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Dual-chamber pacing confers better myocardial performance and improves clinical outcomes compared to single-chamber pacing.World journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Left bundle branch area pacing: A new era of cardiac resynchronization therapy?World journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Left bundle branch pacing set to outshine biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy?World journal of cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that achieves more physiologic native ventricular activation than biventricular pacing (BiVP).
aimTo explore the validity of electromechanical resynchronization, clinical and echocardiographic response of LBBP-CRT.
methodsSystematic review and Meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines as mentioned in detail in the methodology section.
resultsIn our analysis, the success rate of LBBP-CRT was determined to be 91.1%. LBBP-CRT significantly shortened QRS duration, with significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter in comparison with BiVP-CRT.
conclusionA significant reduction in New York Heart Association class and B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also observed in the LBBP-CRT group
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.