Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313151›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2024

A composite index; socioeconomic deprivation and coverage of reproductive and maternal health interventions.

Leonardo Z Ferreira, Fernando C Wehrmeister, Jakob Dirksen, Luis Paulo Vidaletti, Monica Pinilla-Roncancio, Katherine Kirkby, Luiza Ic Ricardo, Aluisio Jd Barros, Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of maternal health on neonatal and long-term kidney outcomes.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Global health inequities: more challenges, some solutions.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonardo Z FerreiraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, R. Marechal Deodoro 1160, Centro, Pelotas, Brazil.
Fernando C WehrmeisterInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, R. Marechal Deodoro 1160, Centro, Pelotas, Brazil.
Jakob DirksenOxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
Luis Paulo VidalettiOxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
Monica Pinilla-RoncancioCentre of Sustainable Development Goals for Latin America and the Caribbean and School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Katherine KirkbyDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Luiza Ic RicardoInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, R. Marechal Deodoro 1160, Centro, Pelotas, Brazil.
Aluisio Jd BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, R. Marechal Deodoro 1160, Centro, Pelotas, Brazil.
Ahmad Reza HosseinpoorDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine inequalities in the coverage of reproductive and maternal health interventions in low- and middle-income countries and territories using a composite index of socioeconomic deprivation status. Methods: We obtained data on education and living standards from national household surveys conducted between 2015 and 2019 to calculate socioeconomic deprivation status. We assessed the coverage of reproductive and maternal health interventions, using three indicators: (i) demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods; (ii) women who received antenatal care in at least four visits; and (iii) the presence of a skilled attendant at delivery. Absolute and relative inequalities were evaluated both directly and using the slope index of inequality and the concentration index. Findings: In the 73 countries and territories with available data, the median proportions of deprivation were 41% in the low-income category, 11% in the lower-middle-income category and less than 1% in the upper-middle-income category. The coverage analysis, conducted for 48 countries with sufficient data, showed consistently lower median coverage among deprived households across all health indicators. The coverage of skilled attendant at delivery showed the largest inequalities, where coverage among the socioeconomically deprived was substantially lower in almost all countries. Antenatal care visits and demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods also showed significant disparities, favouring the less deprived population. Conclusion: The findings highlight persistent disparities in the coverage of reproductive and maternal health interventions, requiring efforts to reduce those disparities and improve coverage, particularly for skilled attendant at delivery.

Indexed as

Maternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID38313151
PMCPMC10835641
OpenAlexW4391542629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.