Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313078›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2024

The impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock post-acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sophie Paddock, James Meng, Nicholas Johnson, Rahul Chattopadhyay, Vasiliki Tsampasian, Vassilios Vassiliou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Relationship Between International Normalized Ratio to Albumin Ratio and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Myocardial Infarction.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie PaddockCardiology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1163-9710
James MengCardiology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.
Nicholas JohnsonNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Rahul ChattopadhyayNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Vasiliki TsampasianCardiology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.
Vassilios VassiliouCardiology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-7752
University of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Cardiogenic shock remains the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used in the treatment of infarct-related cardiogenic shock. However, there is limited evidence regarding its beneficial impact on mortality. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies reporting the impact of VA-ECMO on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Methods and results: A comprehensive search of medical databases (Cochrane Register and PubMed) was conducted. Studies that reported mortality outcomes in patients treated with VA-ECMO for infarct-related cardiogenic shock were included. The database search yielded 1194 results, of which 11 studies were included in the systematic review. Four of these studies, with a total of 586 patients, were randomized controlled trials and were included in the meta-analysis. This demonstrated that there was no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality with the use of VA-ECMO compared with standard medical therapy [odds ratio (OR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.27]. Meta-analysis of two studies showed that VA-ECMO was associated with a significant reduction in 12-month all-cause mortality (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.86). Qualitative synthesis of the observational studies showed that age, serum creatinine, serum lactate, and successful revascularization are independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation does not improve 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction; however, there may be significant reduction in all-cause mortality at 12 months. Further studies are needed to delineate the potential benefit of VA-ECMO in long-term outcomes. Registration: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023461740).

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionCardiogenic shockExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID38313078
PMCPMC10836884
OpenAlexW4391024888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.