ArticlePeerJ2024
Automatic detection of
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning applications in parasite microscopy: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Clinical challenges and technological breakthroughs in helminthic therapy for diabetes.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Development of a Machine Learning Model for the Classification ofJournal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human opisthorchiasis is a dangerous infectious chronic disease distributed in many Asian areas in the water-basins of large rivers, Siberia, and Europe. The gold standard for human opisthorchiasis laboratory diagnosis is the routine examination of Methods: Herein, we propose a convolutional neural network (CNN) for classifying and automatically detecting Results: The proposed model, initially trained on non-augmented data of artifacts (class 0) and Conclusion: This study demonstrated the successful application of CNN in classifying and automating the detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.