ArticlePeerJ2024
A ubiquitination-related risk model for predicting the prognosis and immunotherapy response of gastric adenocarcinoma patients.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- RNF144A and RNF144B: Important molecules for health.Open life sciences · 2025Review
- A New Medical Evaluation for Gastric Cancer Patients to Increase the Success Rate of Immunotherapy: A 2024 Update.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- An ion channel-based prognostic model identified TRPV2 and GJB3 as immunotherapy determinants in pancreatic cancer.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ubiquitination is crucial for the growth of cancer. However, the role of ubiquitination-related genes (URGs) in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) remains unclear. Differentially expressed URGs (DE-URGs) were examined in the whole TCGA-STAD dataset, and the prognosis-related genes were discovered from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) training set. Prognostic genes were discovered using selection operator regression analysis and absolute least shrinkage (LASSO). A multivariate Cox analysis was further employed, and a polygene-based risk assessment system was established. Signatures were verified using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database record GSE84433 and the TCGA test set. Using the MEXPRESS dataset, a detailed analysis of gene expression and methylation was carried out. Using the DAVID database, DE-URG function and pathway enrichment was examined. The identified 163 DE-URGs were significantly associated with pathways related to protein ubiquitination, cell cycle, and cancer. A prognostic signature based on 13 DE-URGs was constructed, classifying patients into two risk groups. Compared to low-risk patients, people at high risk had considerably shorter survival times. Cox regression analyses considered prognostic parameters independent of age and risk score and were used to generate nomograms. Calibration curves show good agreement between nomogram predictions and observations. Furthermore, the results of the MEXPRESS analysis indicated that 13 prognostic DE-URGs had an intricate methylation profile. The enhanced Random Forest-based model showed greater efficacy in predicting prognosis, mutation, and immune infiltration. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.