Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313018›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Using molecular characteristics to distinguish multiple primary lung cancers and intrapulmonary metastases.

Zhenhua Li, Huilai Lv, Fan Zhang, Ziming Zhu, Qiang Guo, Mingbo Wang, Chao Huang, Lijie Guo, Fanfei Meng, Ziqiang Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenhua LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Huilai LvDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Ziming ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Xingtai, Xingtai, China.
Qiang GuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Mingbo WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Chao HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Lijie GuoOrigiMed, Shanghai, China.
Fanfei MengOrigiMed, Shanghai, China.
Ziqiang TianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hebei Medical University · CNUnimed Medical Institute · CNAffiliated Hospital of Hebei University · CNFourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNXingtai People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Multiple lung cancers may present as multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) or intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) with variations in clinical stage, treatment, and prognosis. However, the existing differentiation criteria based on histology do not fully meet the clinical needs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may play an important role in assisting the identification of different pathologies. Here, we extended the relevant data by combining histology and NGS to develop detailed identification criteria for MPLC and IPM. Materials and Methods: Patients with lung cancer (each patient had ≥2 tumors) were enrolled in the training ( Results: The analysis of the training cohort indicated that patients identified with MPLC had no (or <2) trunk or shared mutations. However, 98.02% of mutations were branch mutations, and 69.23% of MPLC had no common mutations. In contrast, a higher percentage of trunk (33.08%) or shared (9.02%) mutations were identified in IPM, suggesting significant differences among mutated components. Subsequently, eight MPLC and five IPM cases were identified in the validation cohort, aligning with the independent imaging and pathologic distinction. Overall, the percentage of trunk and shared mutations was higher in patients with IPM than in patients with MPLC. Based on these results and the establishment of new determination criteria for MPLC and IPM, we emphasize that the type and number of shared variants based on histologic consistency assist in identification. Conclusion: Determining genetic alterations may be an effective method for differentiating MPLC and IPM, and NGS can be used as a valuable assisting tool.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLungMutationIntrapulmonary metastasisMolecular classificationMultiple lung cancerMultiple primary lung cancerNext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38313018
PMCPMC10838092
OpenAlexW4391389661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.