Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313010›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Comparison of kinematics and electromyography in the last repetition during different maximum repetition sets in the barbell back squat.

Hallvard Nygaard Falch, Andreas Hegdahl Gundersen, Stian Larsen, Markus Estifanos Haugen, Roland van den Tillaar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hallvard Nygaard FalchDepartment for Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Levanger, Trøndelag, Norway.
Andreas Hegdahl GundersenDepartment for Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Levanger, Trøndelag, Norway.
Stian LarsenDepartment for Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Levanger, Trøndelag, Norway.
Markus Estifanos HaugenDepartment for Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Levanger, Trøndelag, Norway.
Roland van den TillaarDepartment for Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Levanger, Trøndelag, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The barbell squat is an exercise used to strengthen the lower limbs, with implications for both performance in sports and improving movement during everyday tasks. Although the exercise is being trained across a variety of repetition ranges, the technical requirements may vary, affecting appropriate repetition range for specific training goals. Methods: A randomised within-subject design was used to compare kinematics and surface electromyography (EMG) in the lower extremities during different concentric phases (pre-, sticking- and post-sticking region) of the last repetition when performing squats at different repetition maximums (RMs). Thirteen strength-trained men (age: 23.6 ± 1.9 years; height: 181.1 ± 6.5 cm; body mass: 82.2 kg, 1RM: 122.8 ± 16.2, relative strength: 1.5 ± 0.2 x body mass in external load) performed a 1, 3, 6, and 10RM squat, in a randomised order. Results: The main findings were that barbell-, ankle-, knee- and hip kinematics were similar across different repetition ranges, except for a smaller trunk lean at 1RM in the pre-sticking region compared to other repetitions and in the sticking region compared to 10RM (

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingWeight LiftingAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung AdultAnglesLoadMuscle activitySpecificityStrength

Identifiers

PMID38313010
PMCPMC10838531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.