Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38312811›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of urology2024

Robotic-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage II testicular cancer.

George McClintock, Ahmed S Goolam, Don Perera, Ryan Downey, Scott Leslie, Peter Grimison, Henry Woo, Peter Ferguson, Nariman Ahmadi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

George McClintockDepartment of Urology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ahmed S GoolamDepartment of Urology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Don PereraDepartment of Anaesthesia, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ryan DowneyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Scott LeslieDepartment of Urology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter GrimisonThe University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Henry WooDepartment of Urology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter FergusonThe University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Nariman AhmadiDepartment of Urology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chris O’Brien Lifehouse · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the perioperative as well as early oncological outcomes of patients undergoing robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for treatment of testicular cancer. Methods: We conducted a prospective consecutive case series of patients undergoing robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic testicular cancer between May 2018 and July 2021 at our institution. Data were collected on patient and tumour characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative parameters, and functional and oncological outcomes. Descriptive statistics are presented. Results: Nineteen patients were identified; 18 (94.7%) completed the procedure robotically and one was converted to open surgery; 78.9% of patients had stage ≥IIB and 12 (63.2%) patients had undergone prior chemotherapy. The median operative time was 300 (interquartile range [IQR] 240-315) min. Median blood loss was 100 (IQR 50-175) mL. Median length of stay was 2 (range 1-11) days. All robotically completed patients commenced diet and passed flatus on Day 1 and were discharged by Day 3. The median lymph node yield was 40.5 (IQR 38-51) nodes. All patients undergoing nerve-sparing procedures recovered antegrade ejaculatory function. One patient had a Clavien-Dindo III complication (chylous ascites requiring drainage). At a median follow-up of 22.3 (IQR 16.3-24.9) months, one patient developed retroperitoneal recurrence, which was successfully treated with second-line chemotherapy; no other patients have had recurrences. Conclusion: Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in appropriately selected patients, offering low morbidity. Early oncological outcomes are promising. Larger cohorts and longer follow-ups are required to validate our institution's findings.

Indexed as

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissectionRetroperitoneal node dissectionRobotic surgeryTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID38312811
PMCPMC10837656
OpenAlexW4288886361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.