Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38312802›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2024

The biomechanics of wounds at physiologically relevant levels: Understanding skin's stress-shielding effect for the quantitative assessment of healing.

Sara Medina-Lombardero, Connor Bain, Laura Charlton, Antonella Pellicoro, Holly Rocliffe, Jenna Cash, Robert Reuben, Michael L Crichton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-Axis Stretchable Zippers for Personalized Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Sensory nerve-secreted factors regulate basal keratinocyte functionIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A PIEZO-Gated Mechanotransduction Timing Window Governs Scar Commitment in Wound Healing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara Medina-LombarderoSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
Connor BainSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
Laura CharltonSchool of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3RF, United Kingdom.
Antonella PellicoroCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom.
Holly RocliffeCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom.
Jenna CashCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom.
Robert ReubenSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
Michael L CrichtonSchool of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wounds are responsible for the decrease in quality of life of billions of people around the world. Their assessment relies on subjective parameters which often delays optimal treatments and results in increased healthcare costs. In this work, we sought to understand and quantify how wounds at different healing stages (days 1, 3, 7 and 14 post wounding) change the mechanical properties of the tissues that contain them, and how these could be measured at clinically relevant strain levels, as a step towards quantitative wound tracking technologies. To achieve this, we used digital image correlation and mechanical testing on a mouse model of wound healing to map the global and local tissue strains. We found no significant differences in the elastic and viscoelastic properties of wounded vs unwounded skin when samples were measured in bulk, presumably as these were masked by the protective mechanisms of skin, which redistributes the applied loads to mitigate high stresses and reduce tissue damage. By measuring local strain values and observing the distinct patterns they formed, it was possible to establish a connection between the healing phase of the tissue (determined by the time post-injury and the observed histological features) and the overall mechanical behaviour. Importantly, these parameters were measured from the surface of the tissue, using physiologically relevant strains without increasing the tissue's damage. Adaptations of these approaches for clinical use have the potential to aid in the identification of skin healing problems, such as excessive inflammation or lack of mechanical progression over time. An increase, decrease, or lack of change in the elasticity and viscoelasticity parameters, can be indicative of wound state, thus ultimately leading to improved diagnostic outcomes.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsCollagen alignmentDigital image correlationSkinTensile testingViscoelasticityWound healing

Identifiers

PMID38312802
PMCPMC10835282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.