Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38312672›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Clinical decision support tool for breast cancer recurrence prediction using SHAP value in cooperative game theory.

Ying Liu, Yating Fu, Yadong Peng, Jie Ming

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ying LiuSpecial Needs Comprehensive Department, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, China.
Yating FuUrumqi Stomatological Hospital, 196 Zhongshan Road, Tianshan District, 830002, Urumqi, China.
Yadong PengSpecial Needs Comprehensive Department, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, China.
Jie MingMedical Imaging Center, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, China.
Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNUrumqi General Hospital of PLA · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recurrence remains the primary cause of death in patients with breast cancer. Although machine learning can efficiently predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients, the black-box nature of the model may result in a lack of evidence for clinicians when making critical decisions. Methods: In this study, our main objective was twofold: (1) to develop a clinical decision support tool for predicting the prognosis of breast cancer and (2) to identify and explore the key factors that influence breast cancer recurrence. To achieve this, we employed an explainable ensemble learning method called Shapley additive explanation (SHAP), which leverages cooperative game theory. Using real-world data from 1629 breast cancer patients, we analyzed and uncovered the key factors associated with breast cancer recurrence. Subsequently, we used these identified factors to create a recurrence prediction model and establish a decision mechanism for the tool. The proposed method not only provides accurate recurrence predictions but also offers transparent explanations for these predictions. Results: By utilizing four key factors, namely, tumor size, clinical stage III, number of lymph node metastases, and age, our decision support tool for predicting breast cancer recurrence achieved significant improvements. The extra-tree model exhibited an increased area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.97, while the Random Forest model demonstrated an improved AUC of 0.96. We also offer a decision mechanism for a recurrence prediction model based on the identified key factors. This transparent and interpretable decision-making process facilitated by our explainable ensemble learning model enhances trust and promotes its applicability in clinical settings. Conclusions: The proposed explainable ensemble learning method shows promising results in predicting breast cancer recurrence, outperforming existing methods with high accuracy and transparency. This advancement has the potential to significantly improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in breast cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCancer recurrenceExplainable ensemble learningSHAP

Identifiers

PMID38312672
PMCPMC10835316
OpenAlexW4390987724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.