Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38312629›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Design of risk prediction model for esophageal cancer based on machine learning approach.

Raoof Nopour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raoof NopourDepartment of Health Information Management, Student Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences Branch, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a highly prevalent and progressive disease. Early prediction of EC risk in the population is crucial in preventing this disease and enhancing the overall health of individuals. So far, few studies have been conducted on predicting the EC risk based on the prediction models, and most of them focused on statistical methods. The ML approach obtained efficient predictive insights into the clinical domain. Therefore, this study aims to develop a risk prediction model for EC based on risk factors and by leveraging the ML approach to stratify the high-risk EC people and obtain efficient preventive purposes at the community level. Material and methods: The current retrospective study was performed from 2018 to 2022 in Sari City based on 3256 EC and non-EC cases. The six selected algorithms, including Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XG-Boost), Bagging, K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), were used to develop the risk prediction model for EC and achieve the preventive purposes. Results: Comparing the performance efficiency of algorithms revealed that the XG-Boost model gained the best predictability for EC risk with AU-ROC = 0.92 and AU-ROC-test = 0.889 for internal and validation states, respectively. Based on the XG-Boost, the factors, including sex, drinking hot liquids, fruit consumption, achalasia, and vegetable consumption, were considered the five top predictors of EC risk. Conclusion: This study showed that the XG-Boost could provide insight into the early prediction of the EC risk for people and clinical providers to stratify the high-risk group of EC and achieve preventive measures based on modifying the risk factors associated with EC and other clinical solutions.

Indexed as

Esophageal cancerMachine learningPrediction modelPreventive purposesRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID38312629
PMCPMC10835323
OpenAlexW4391070912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.