ArticleHeliyon2024
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of botulinum neurotoxin in the treatment of hemifacial spasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Hemifacial spasm: an update on pathophysiology, investigations and management.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Comprehensive Review on Clinical and Pharmacological Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluating YouTube as a source of information on hemifacial spasm.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- Botulinum toxin type A injections demonstrate remarkable efficacy in treating hemifacial spasm in elderly patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It is widely acknowledged that botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has been widely used in the treatment of hemifacial spasm (HFS). However, there is currently a lack of systematic analysis of the factors affecting its therapeutic effect. Therefore, this study aims to explore the influencing factors of BTX-A in the treatment of HFS and to identify risk factors for poor prognosis. Methods: Retrospective study including 118 patients with HFS treated with BTX-A from 2019 January to 2023 April. Demographic and etiological variables as well as doses, number of sessions of BTX-A, infiltrated muscles, therapeutic response according to the Cohen evaluation scale, and side effects were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors that are associated with the short-term prognosis of BTX-A for the treatment of HFS. Results: Among the 118 patients with HFS included in this study, 57 achieved complete relief, 51 had significant relief, 7 had partial relief, and no improvement was observed in 3. The overall effective rate was 91.53 %. Results from the univariate analysis indicated that male, drinking, diabetes, and hypertension were all associated with poor short-term prognosis of BTX-A in the treatment of HFS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis further revealed that hypertension was an independent risk factor for poor short-term prognosis following BTX-A treatment for HFS (OR=5.847, Conclusion: BTX-A was effective in treating HFS and had minimal adverse effects. Hypertension was an independent risk factor for poor short-term prognosis following BTX-A treatment of HFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.