Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38312599›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A retrospective study of non-equidistant interstitial brain CT perfusion scanning and prediction of time to peak.

Yaxin Duan, Jia Yao, Yingjian Jiang, Wen Sun, Fengtan Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaxin DuanDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300070, China.
Jia YaoDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300070, China.
Yingjian JiangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300070, China.
Wen SunDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300070, China.
Fengtan LiDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300070, China.
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eexploring the limits of CT cranial perfusion scan acquisition intervals and predicting time to peak. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients with suspected stroke who underwent brain CTP scans. Different sampling intervals were set based on the TDC. The patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 underwent continuous scanning with a uniform interval of 1.5 s; Group 2 had a uniform interval of 3 s; Group 3 had a 1.5-s interval between arterial and venous peak vertices with 1 point retained before and after the peak for 1.5 s and with a remaining acquisition interval of 4.5 s; and Group 4 had a uniform interval of 4.5 s. Statistical analysis was performed on the perfusion parameters of each group. Additionally, in 286 patients who underwent head and neck CTA examinations, the peak time of contrast medium was recorded, and the peak time was predicted based on factors such as age, height, weight, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and total cholesterol. The results compared with Group 1 and Group 2, as well as Group 1 and Group 3, the P values of CBF, CBV, MTT, and Tmax in the left and right cerebral hemispheres of healthy subjects and in the infarct and noninfarct areas of patients were all >0.05. A comparison between Group 1 and Group 4 showed that right cerebral hemisphere CBF and CBV, left cerebral hemisphere CBF, CBV, and Tmax, infarct area CBV and Tmax, and noninfarct area CBF, CBV, and MTT had P values > 0.05, while other groups all had P values < 0.05. Bland‒Altman analysis showed that the perfusion parameters in Group 1 were consistent with those in Group 2, and those in Group 1 were consistent with those in Group 3. The radiation doses in the second and third groups were lower, and the dose in the third group was lower than that in the second group. Conclusion: Continuous acquisition between the peak points of the arterial and venous phases, with 1 point reserved before and after the peak and a 4.5-s interval for the rest, represents the maximum time interval for CTP scanning and can effectively reduce the radiation dose. The formula Tmax (s) = 0.290 × height (cm) - 0.226 × heart rate (times/min) + 0.216 × age (years) - 1.901 × triglycerides (mmol/L) - 0.061 × systolic blood pressure (mmHg) - 7.216 (R2 = 0.449, F = 17.905, P < 0.01) was established for predicting time to peak enhancement.

Indexed as

BrainCerebral CT perfusionCTAQuantitative CT perfusionStroke

Identifiers

PMID38312599
PMCPMC10835286
OpenAlexW4391043048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.