ArticleHeliyon2024
Improving diabetes disease patients classification using stacking ensemble method with PIMA and local healthcare data.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Diabetes Prediction in Heterogeneous Health Care Systems: Algorithm Development and Validation of a Secure Federated Ensemble Framework.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Pediatric diabetes prediction using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid BiLSTM and rule-based system for integrated diabetes prediction and personalized guidance.PloS one · 2026Article
- Predicting and classifying type 2 diabetes using a transparent ensemble model combining random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DiaBD: A diabetes dataset for enhanced risk analysis and research in Bangladesh.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Efficient diagnosis of diabetes mellitus using an improved ensemble method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Trivial State Fuzzy Processing for Error Reduction in Healthcare Big Data Analysis towards Precision Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Stacking with Recursive Feature Elimination-Isolation Forest for classification of diabetes mellitus.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus, a chronic metabolic disorder, continues to be a major public health issue around the world. It is estimated that one in every two diabetics is undiagnosed. Early diagnosis and management of diabetes can also prevent or delay the onset of complications. With the help of a variety of machine learning and deep learning models, stacking algorithms, and other techniques, our study's goal is to detect diseases early. In this study, we propose two stacking-based models for diabetes disease classification using a combination of the PIMA Indian diabetes dataset, simulated data, and additional data collected from a local healthcare facility. We use both the classical and deep neural network stacking ensemble methods to combine the predictions of multiple classification models and improve classification accuracy and robustness. In the evaluation protocol, we used both the train-test and cross-validation (CV) techniques to validate our proposed model. The highest accuracy is obtained by stacking ensemble with three NN architectures, resulting in an accuracy of 95.50 %, precision of 94 %, recall of 97 %, and f1-score of 96 % using 5-fold CV on simulation study. The stacked accuracy obtained from ML algorithms for the Pima Indian Diabetes dataset is 75.03 % using the train-test split protocol, while the accuracy obtained from the CV protocol is 77.10 % on the stacked model. The range of performance scores that outperformed the CV protocol 2.23 %-12 %. Our proposed method achieves a high accuracy range from 92 % to 95 %, precision, recall, and F1-score ranges from 88 % to 96 % using classical and deep neural network (NN)-based stacking method on the primary dataset. The proposed dataset and ensemble method could be useful in the early detection and treatment of diabetes, as well as in the advancement of machine learning and data analysis techniques in the healthcare industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.