ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparison of the different operation room environmental exposures on tear film function before and after operation.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influencing of coal industry related airborne particulate matter on ocular surface tear film injury and inflammatory factor expression in Sprague-Dawley rats.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Interventions to prevent visual fatigue during robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1.2 Previous studies have confirmed that air and light pollution can cause damage to a number of systems throughout the body, including the ocular surface and retina. However, the exact effect of air pollution and light pollution on tear film function is not clear. This study explored the different operation room environmental exposures on tear film function before and after operation. Sixty medical staff in the operating room were selected and divided into 4 groups according to different surgical methods to evaluate the tear film function before and after operation: Da Vinci surgery group (DVSS), Laparoscopic surgery group (LS), Traditional surgery group (TS), and Ophthalmic microsurgery group (OM). The results showed that the levels of light and air pollution were elevated in operating rooms during the operation and the changes of tear film function in the other three groups were statistically significant except for DVSS group. In TS group, particulate matter (pm) 1 (R = 0.61, p < 0.01), pm2.5 (R = 0.63, p < 0.01), and pm10 (R = 0.67, p < 0.01) were positively correlated with eye redness index, and first and average noninvasive tear film break-up times were positively correlated with illuminance (R = 0.54, p < 0.05; R = 0.97, p < 0.01). In OM group, there was a positive correlation between the operation time and the first (R = 0.69, p < 0.01) and average (R = 0.89, p < 0.01) noninvasive tear film break-up times. Our research found that exposure to different operating room environment will lead to damage of tear film function, but also provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of surgical environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.