Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38312525›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2024

Do Not Throw Away Your Shot: Pilot Study in Improving Medical School Curricula Through Focused Vaccine Education.

Jorna Sojati, Anjana Murali, Glenn Rapsinski, John V Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorna SojatiDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Anjana MuraliDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Glenn RapsinskiDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
John V WilliamsDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM FOR MD/PHD STUDENTST32GM008208 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STEINMAN, RICHARD A · 1987 to 2021
$15.4M
Molecular Basis of Pediatric DiseaseK12HD052892 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TERENCE S. DERMODY · 2007 to 2026
$6.5M
Host Determinants of Human Metapneumovirus Immunity and PathogenesisR01AI085062 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI John V. Williams · 2010 to 2026
$5.6M
University of Pittsburgh Training Program in Antimicrobial ResistanceT32AI138954 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRISON, LEE H · 2019 to 2023
$971k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI085062NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI138954NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052892NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With widely prevalent vaccine hesitancy and medical mistrust, future healthcare providers require knowledge of vaccines and comfort in discussing vaccines with patients. However, many U.S. medical schools do not offer formal or elective curricula focused on vaccine education. Methods: We sought to identify the need for such a curriculum and student gaps in knowledge through a pilot study surveying first- and second-year medical students at a large Pennsylvania medical school to assess knowledge about vaccine initiatives/policies, comfort in discussing vaccines, attitudes toward curricular changes, and effects of COVID-19 on willingness for vaccine education. Results: Many participants (>40%) reported insufficient knowledge of vaccine policy, vaccine development and testing, and community vaccine initiatives. The majority (>50%) indicated discomfort in discussing vaccines in a clinical setting. Importantly, 79% of participants reported insufficient coverage of vaccine topics in the current curriculum. A total of 54% decisively wanted formal/mandatory education versus 72% who decisively wanted elective education. Desiring formal education was associated with less comfort in discussing vaccines overall and with vaccine-hesitant people in clinical settings. Reassuringly, 74% of participants noted that the COVID-19 pandemic made them want to learn more about vaccines. Guided by these findings, we conducted a pilot elective teaching about vaccines through case studies, interactive discussions, and role-playing scenarios. Pre- and postcourse surveys showed improvement in student knowledge in all vaccine-related topics assessed. Conclusions: These data can inform the development of formal and elective curricula that effectively prepare medical students for patients' vaccine questions.

Indexed as

education researchMedical educationvaccine educationvaccines

Identifiers

PMID38312525
PMCPMC10835123
OpenAlexW4390129366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.