ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Synergistic Activity of 3-Hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-Thiol in Combination with Penicillin Against MRSA.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Effects of Thymoquinone, 3-Hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-Thiol, and Amphotericin B Against Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Thymoquinone and 3HQ synergy inhibits CTX-M-15 ESBL.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Unveiling the synergistic power of 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol and vancomycin against MRSA: AnBiomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Repurposing the Anticancer Drug Cisplatin for Antibacterial Therapy: Evaluating Its Efficacy AgainstInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- The Combination of 3-Hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-Thiol with Thymoquinone Demonstrates Synergistic Activity Against DifferentInfection and drug resistance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growing resistance seen in various antibiotics, including those considered as last-resort options, underscores the pressing need for novel approaches and new substances to address MRSA infections. Combining antibiotics as a treatment approach can enhance effectiveness, expand the range of targeted bacteria, and minimize the likelihood of resistance emergence. This approach holds promise in addressing the escalating issue of antibiotic resistance. Purpose: This study seeks to investigate the potential synergy between 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol and penicillin against a diverse array of MRSA isolates, thereby providing insights into their combined antimicrobial action. Methods: Twenty-two clinical MRSA isolates subjected to broth microdilution to determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol and penicillin. Subsequently, a checkerboard assay was employed to evaluate the interaction between 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol and penicillin, focusing on the Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI). Results: The MICs of penicillin and 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol were determined for 22 clinical MRSA strains. Penicillin exhibited MICs within a range of 1024 to 128 µg/mL, while 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol displayed MICs varying from 64 to 8 µg/mL. Remarkably, the combination of 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol and penicillin yielded a synergistic effect, resulting in a significant reduction of MICs by up to 64-fold. Conclusion: The potential of 3-hydrazinoquinoxaline-2-thiol in combination with penicillin as a viable solution against MRSA appears promising. However, to establish its practical utility, further extensive testing and experiments are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.