ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Optimizing DUS testing for
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of geometric morphometrics for variety identification inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal stability of DUS characteristics in maize and evaluation of spatial replication testing models.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Microbial Resilience in Arid Soils: Ecological Responses to Drought and Salinity Stress.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Identification of the MADS-Box Gene Family and Development of Simple Sequence Repeat Markers inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Reducing costs and shortening the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method to improve DNA extraction efficiency from wintersweet and some other plants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Establishment of Novel Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses jointly reveal the mechanism underlying the reddening ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.