Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38312260›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2024

Costs of UK community care for individuals with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: Findings of the Prospective Epidermolysis Bullosa Longitudinal Evaluation Study.

Eunice Jeffs, Elizabeth Pillay, Lesedi Ledwaba-Chapman, Alessandra Bisquera, Susan Robertson, John McGrath, Yanzhong Wang, Anna Martinez, Anita Patel, Jemima Mellerio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Eunice JeffsSt John's Institute of Dermatology Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust London UK.
Elizabeth PillaySt John's Institute of Dermatology Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust London UK.
Lesedi Ledwaba-ChapmanDepartment of Population Health Sciences King's College London London UK.
Alessandra BisqueraDepartment of Population Health Sciences King's College London London UK.
Susan RobertsonDepartment of Dermatology The Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia.
John McGrathDepartment of Dermatology King's College London Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine London UK.
Yanzhong WangDepartment of Population Health Sciences King's College London London UK.
Anna MartinezDepartment of Dermatology Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children London UK.
Anita PatelAnita Patel Health Economics Consulting Ltd London UK.
Jemima MellerioDepartment of Population Health Sciences King's College London London UK.
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBBH Consulting (Ireland) · IEGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBRoyal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare inherited skin fragility disorder requiring multidisciplinary management. Information regarding costs of current standard treatment is scant. Objectives: As part of a longitudinal natural history study, we explored the community care costs of UK patients with different forms of RDEB. Methods: Fifty-nine individuals with RDEB provided detailed information on multiple facets of RDEB including disease severity scores (iscorEB, BEBS) and patient reported outcomes (quality of life evaluation in epidermolysis bullosa, iscorEB patient questionnaire). Costs data included time spent doing dressings, frequency of dressing changes, details of materials used, and paid and unpaid care. Results: Overall costs of dressing materials and associated care were high in RDEB. Median annual costs across all subtypes for those using dressings ( Conclusions: The findings demonstrate the high costs of care of RDEB, particularly for RDEB-S. The current expense supports the drive to develop new therapies which accelerate wound healing and diminish total wound burden, thereby reducing costs of dressings and care. While costly to bring to market, these might ultimately reduce the overall cost of treatment and also the impact on individuals living with this rare disease. The data also highlight the need for adequate reimbursement for EB care which can place significant financial strain on families.

Identifiers

PMID38312260
PMCPMC10831550
OpenAlexW4390776806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.