ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Augusta: From RNA-Seq to gene regulatory networks and Boolean models.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional connectivity networks for transportation delay analysis: From theory to software.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2026Article
- From articles to code: on-demand generation of core algorithms from scientific publications.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- FUNCellA: A Tool for Single-Sample Enrichment Analysis and Relative Pathway Activity Estimation in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Decoding yeast transcriptional regulation via a data-and mechanism-driven distributed large-scale network model.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Article
- NeKo: A tool for automatic network construction from prior knowledge.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models of gene regulations help to understand regulatory mechanisms and are extensively used in a wide range of areas, e.g., biotechnology or medicine, with significant benefits. Unfortunately, there are only a few computational gene regulatory models of whole genomes allowing static and dynamic analysis due to the lack of sophisticated tools for their reconstruction. Here, we describe Augusta, an open-source Python package for Gene Regulatory Network (GRN) and Boolean Network (BN) inference from the high-throughput gene expression data. Augusta can reconstruct genome-wide models suitable for static and dynamic analyses. Augusta uses a unique approach where the first estimation of a GRN inferred from expression data is further refined by predicting transcription factor binding motifs in promoters of regulated genes and by incorporating verified interactions obtained from databases. Moreover, a refined GRN is transformed into a draft BN by searching in the curated model database and setting logical rules to incoming edges of target genes, which can be further manually edited as the model is provided in the SBML file format. The approach is applicable even if information about the organism under study is not available in the databases, which is typically the case for non-model organisms including most microbes. Augusta can be operated from the command line and, thus, is easy to use for automated prediction of models for various genomes. The Augusta package is freely available at github.com/JanaMus/Augusta. Documentation and tutorials are available at augusta.readthedocs.io.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.