Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38312122›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2024

Automatic detection of small bowel lesions with different bleeding risks based on deep learning models.

Rui-Ya Zhang, Peng-Peng Qiang, Ling-Jun Cai, Tao Li, Yan Qin, Yu Zhang, Yi-Qing Zhao, Jun-Ping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rui-Ya ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi Province, China.
Peng-Peng QiangSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi Province, China.
Ling-Jun CaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi Province, China.
Tao LiSchool of Life Sciences and Technology, Mudanjiang Normal University, Mudanjiang 157011, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Yan QinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi Province, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi Province, China.
Yi-Qing ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi Province, China.
Jun-Ping WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, Shanxi Province, China. wangjp8396@sxmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning provides an efficient automatic image recognition method for small bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (CE) that can assist physicians in diagnosis. However, the existing deep learning models present some unresolved challenges.

aimTo propose a novel and effective classification and detection model to automatically identify various SB lesions and their bleeding risks, and label the lesions accurately so as to enhance the diagnostic efficiency of physicians and the ability to identify high-risk bleeding groups.

methodsThe proposed model represents a two-stage method that combined image classification with object detection. First, we utilized the improved ResNet-50 classification model to classify endoscopic images into SB lesion images, normal SB mucosa images, and invalid images. Then, the improved YOLO-V5 detection model was utilized to detect the type of lesion and its risk of bleeding, and the location of the lesion was marked. We constructed training and testing sets and compared model-assisted reading with physician reading.

resultsThe accuracy of the model constructed in this study reached 98.96%, which was higher than the accuracy of other systems using only a single module. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the model-assisted reading detection of all images were 99.17%, 99.92%, and 99.86%, which were significantly higher than those of the endoscopists' diagnoses. The image processing time of the model was 48 ms/image, and the image processing time of the physicians was 0.40 ± 0.24 s/image (

conclusionThe deep learning model of image classification combined with object detection exhibits a satisfactory diagnostic effect on a variety of SB lesions and their bleeding risks in CE images, which enhances the diagnostic efficiency of physicians and improves the ability of physicians to identify high-risk bleeding groups.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansIntestine, SmallArtificial intelligenceBleeding riskCapsule endoscopyDeep learningImage classificationObject detection

Identifiers

PMID38312122
PMCPMC10835517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.