ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches for Right Hemihepatectomy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Safety and Short-Term Outcomes.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with China reporting over half of global cases. While traditional open liver resection is effective, it often results in large incisions and significant complications. Laparoscopic hepatectomy, particularly for right hemi-hepatectomy, features smaller incisions and quicker recovery, but its widespread adoption is hindered by its procedural complexity and a steep learning curve. This study compares the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open right hemi-hepatectomy with an anterior approach in 57 patients with HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS The data of patients with HCC who underwent treatment at our center from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS We included a total of 57 patients with histopathologically-confirmed HCC - 23 in the laparoscopic group and 34 in the open group. Operation time was significantly shorter in the open group than in the laparoscopic group (234.5±66.9 vs 297.0±74.9, P=0.002). Intraoperative bleeding was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (P=0.042). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications between the 2 groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (12 days vs 15 days, P=0.044). There was no significant difference in postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the laparoscopic right hemi-hepatectomy with the anterior approach technique has the same safety and comparable short-term outcomes as open surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.