Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38311708›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2024

Targeting BRCA and PALB2 in Pancreatic Cancer.

Sriram Anbil, Kim A Reiss

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Phase II Trial of Niraparib in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Harboring Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and CHEK2.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sriram AnbilAbramson Cancer Center, 10th Floor Perelman Center South, The University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA.
Kim A ReissAbramson Cancer Center, 10th Floor Perelman Center South, The University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA. Kim.ReissBinder@Pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementAn important subgroup of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) harbor pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2. These tumors are exquisitely sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and patients may experience deep and durable responses to this treatment. PARP inhibitors offer potential respite from the cumulative toxicities of chemotherapy as they significantly extend progression-free survival compared to a chemotherapy holiday. Given the lack of proven survival benefit, the decision to use a maintenance PARP inhibitor rather than continue chemotherapy should be individualized. Interestingly, in both published clinical trials of maintenance PARP inhibitors, there is a striking range of interpatient benefit: Even in the platinum-sensitive setting, roughly 25% of tumors appear to be PARP inhibitor refractory (progressive disease within 2 months of starting treatment), 50% sustain moderate benefit (up to 2 years), and 25% are hyper-responsive (more than 2 years of benefit). This finding highlights the need to refine our understanding of which patients will respond to maintenance PARP inhibitors, both by being able to identify biallelic loss and by deepening our knowledge of resistance mechanisms and who develops them. Recent data supports that reversion mutations are common in PARP inhibitor refractory patients, but we have little understanding of the mechanisms that drive delayed resistance and long-term responses. Identifying which patients are more prone to certain mechanisms of resistance and tackling them with specific treatment strategies are areas of active investigation. Additionally, given that PARP inhibitors have limited overall efficacy for most patients, upfront combination strategies are an important future strategy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsOvarian NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinFemaleHumansMutationPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesAntineoplastic AgentsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinPALB2 protein, humanPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesBRCA1BRCA2Homologous recombination deficiencyPALB2Pancreatic cancerPARP inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID38311708
OpenAlexW4391545713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.