ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2024
Levofloxacin susceptibility of Staphylococci from conjunctiva in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microneedle delivery platform integrated withActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe ocular surface in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is known to harbor an abundance of gram-positive cocci, particularly Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). This study reviewed the results of microbial cultures from the conjunctiva in AD patients, with special attention to the levofloxacin susceptibility of Staphylococci. STUDY
designRetrospective, single-center study.
methodsThis study involved 131 eyes of 112 Japanese patients with AD (87 men and 25 women, mean age: 40.4 ± 12.2 years) who underwent ocular surgery at Kyorin University Hospital. Bacterial isolates were collected from the conjunctival sacs in the preoperative period. Drug resistance to methicillin and levofloxacin was judged using the minimal inhibitory concentrations of oxacillin and levofloxacin determined by the broth dilution method.
resultsOne hundred and fifty-seven strains were identified in 103 of the 131 eyes examined. S. aureus was isolated from 74 eyes (56.5%), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis). In S. aureus, 11 strains (14.9%) were methicillin-resistant, and 18 (24.3%) were levofloxacin-resistant. In S. epidermidis, 15 strains (26.8%) were methicillin-resistant, and 17 (30.4%) were levofloxacin-resistant. No significant differences were observed in levofloxacin susceptibility with age, sex, previous ocular surgery, or duration of previous surgery. However, logistic multivariate analysis revealed that levofloxacin-resistant Staphylococci were concurrently resistant to methicillin, suggesting multidrug resistance.
conclusionDistinctive bacterial distribution and drug resistance need consideration in the managing of ocular disorders among patients with AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38311688What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.