ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2024
Reliability of the original and brief versions of the Eating Disorder Examination in binge-eating disorder.
Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining Heterogeneity of Patient Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial for Binge-Eating Disorder Testing Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Lisdexamfetamine, Alone and Combined.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Trial
- Is there harm in behavioral lifestyle weight management for binge-eating disorder in patients with obesity: Findings from a randomized controlled trial.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2025Trial
- Rapid response to behavioral/pharmacological obesity treatments for binge-eating disorder predicts better clinical outcomes.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Trial
- Lifestyle behavioral weight-loss treatment for binge-eating disorder in patients with obesity: where's the harm?Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Trial
- Men and women who seek treatment for binge-spectrum eating disorders have similar baseline characteristics.Appetite · 2026Article
- Obesity and psychology: a bibliometric analysis of half a century.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePsychometric studies evaluating the reliability of eating-disorder assessment among individuals with binge-eating disorder (BED) have been limited. The current study documents the interrater reliability and internal consistency of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) interview when administered to adults with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5)-defined BED.
methodsParticipants (N = 56) were adults seeking treatment for BED in the context of clinical trials testing pharmacological and psychological treatments. Doctoral-level, trained, and supervised clinical researchers evaluated eating-disorder psychopathology using the EDE interview and audio-recorded the interview. A second doctoral-level, trained, and supervised clinical researcher, who did not conduct the initial assessment, coded eating-disorder psychopathology using the audio recording.
resultsAgreement among raters on the number of binge-eating episodes was near perfect. There was excellent interrater reliability for nearly all scales of the EDE interview. Agreement among raters for behavioral indicators of loss of control and marked distress regarding binge eating ranged from moderate to perfect. Internal consistency was variable for all scales, ranging from unacceptable to good.
conclusionsOur study suggests that the EDE can be administered reliably by multiple interviewers to assess adults with BED. However, internal consistency was mostly subpar. Tests of reliability and other psychometric properties (e.g., validity) in other patient groups such as children with BED are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.