ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2024
Longitudinal stability of reward and relief drinking phenotypes in community and treatment-seeking individuals who engage in heavy drinking.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reward, relief, and habit drinking profiles in treatment seeking individuals with an AUD.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2024Trial
- Finding purpose: Integrated latent profile and machine learning analyses identify purpose in life as an important predictor of high-functioning recovery after alcohol treatment.Addictive behaviors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrecision medicine approaches aim to improve treatment outcomes by identifying which treatments work best for specific individual phenotypes. In the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD), precision medicine approaches have been proposed based on phenotypes characterized by individuals who drink primarily to enhance rewarding experiences (i.e., reward drinking) or those who drink primarily to relieve negative states (i.e., relief drinking). This study examined these phenotypes across treatment- and nontreatment-seeking individuals and the stability of the phenotypes over time.
methodsWe used latent profile and latent transition analyses to identify and assess longitudinal stability (over 3 or 4 months) of reward and relief drinking subgroups within a nontreatment-seeking community sample that engaged in hazardous drinking (n = 189) and two treatment-seeking samples of individuals with AUD enrolled in two large clinical trials (n = 1726, n = 1383). We examined prospective associations with alcohol consumption and consequences at long-term follow-up (15 or 18 months).
resultsResults supported four subgroups: low reward/low relief, low reward/high relief, high reward/low relief, and high reward/high relief. The community sample contained more individuals classified within the high reward/low relief subgroup than treatment-seeking samples. Subgroups were generally more stable over time in the community sample than in the treatment-seeking samples. Alcohol consumption and consequences decreased over time for the treatment-seeking samples, with consequences and drinking frequency decreasing for the community sample. Participants classified within the high reward/high relief and low reward/high relief groups reported the most consequences and consumption at long-term follow-up.
conclusionReward and relief drinking phenotypes can be identified within community and treatment-seeking samples of individuals who drink heavily. The phenotypic subgroups appear to be stable over time in the absence of treatment, change somewhat during treatment, and provide utility in predicting alcohol consumption and consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.