ArticleBone2024
A comprehensive set of ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers to assess cortical bone health: A feasibility study at clinical field strength.
Article in Bone, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor survivors' musculoskeletal health assessment: advances in imaging biomarkers for cancer treatment-related sequelae.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Feasibility of bone-like MRI for acetabular morphology assessment in developmental dysplasia of the hip.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Cohesive Extended Finite Element Modeling of Atypical Femoral Fracture.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- UTE MRI technical developments and applications in osteoporosis: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionConventional bone imaging methods primarily use X-ray techniques to assess bone mineral density (BMD), focusing exclusively on the mineral phase. This approach lacks information about the organic phase and bone water content, resulting in an incomplete evaluation of bone health. Recent research highlights the potential of ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE MRI) to measure cortical porosity and estimate BMD based on signal intensity. UTE MRI also provides insights into bone water distribution and matrix organization, enabling a comprehensive bone assessment with a single imaging technique. Our study aimed to establish quantifiable UTE MRI-based biomarkers at clinical field strength to estimate BMD and microarchitecture while quantifying bound water content and matrix organization.
methodsFemoral bones from 11 cadaveric specimens (n = 4 males 67-92 yrs of age, n = 7 females 70-95 yrs of age) underwent dual-echo UTE MRI (3.0 T, 0.45 mm resolution) with different echo times and high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) imaging (60.7 μm voxel size). Following registration, a 4.5 mm HR-pQCT region of interest was divided into four quadrants and used across the multi-modal images. Statistical analysis involved Pearson correlation between UTE MRI porosity index and a signal-intensity technique used to estimate BMD with corresponding HR-pQCT measures. UTE MRI was used to calculate T
resultsThe UTE MRI-derived porosity index and signal-intensity-based estimated BMD correlated with the HR-pQCT variables (porosity: r = 0.73, p = 0.006; BMD: r = 0.79, p = 0.002). However, these correlations varied in strength when we examined each of the four quadrants (subregions, r = 0.11-0.71). T
conclusionUTE MRI shows promise for being an innocuous method for estimating cortical porosity and BMD parameters while also giving insight into bone hydration and matrix organization. This method offers the potential to equip clinicians with a more comprehensive array of imaging biomarkers to assess bone health without the need for invasive or ionizing procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.