Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38310604›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024

The perception of ultrasonic vocalizations by laboratory mice following intense noise exposures.

Payton E Charlton, Kali Burke, Anastasiya Kobrina, Amanda M Lauer, Micheal L Dent

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Payton E CharltonDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA.
Kali BurkeDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA.
Anastasiya KobrinaDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA.
Amanda M LauerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Center for Hearing and Balance, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4184-7374
Micheal L DentDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-501X
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Supplement for temporal bone tissue scanning equipmentR01DC016641 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DENT, MICHEAL L, LAUER, AMANDA M. · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Complex Sound Perception in MiceR01DC012302 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI DENT, MICHEAL L · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012302NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss interacts with age, sex, and listening conditions to affect individuals' perception of ecologically relevant stimuli like speech. The present experiments assessed the impact of age and sex on vocalization detection by noise-exposed mice trained to detect a downsweep or complex ultrasonic vocalization in quiet or in the presence of a noise background. Daily thresholds before and following intense noise exposure were collected longitudinally and compared across several factors. All mice, regardless of age, sex, listening condition, or stimulus type showed their poorest behavioral sensitivity immediately after the noise exposure. There were varying degrees of recovery over time and across factors. Old-aged mice had greater threshold shifts and less recovery compared to middle-aged mice. Mice had larger threshold shifts and less recovery for downsweeps than for complex vocalizations. Female mice were more sensitive, had smaller post-noise shifts, and had better recovery than males. Thresholds in noise were higher and less variable than thresholds in quiet, but there were comparable shifts and recovery. In mice, as in humans, the perception of ecologically relevant stimuli suffers after an intense noise exposure, and results differ from simple tone detection findings.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedSpeech PerceptionAnimalsAuditory ThresholdFemaleHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedNoiseSpeech Reception Threshold TestVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID38310604
PMCPMC10838193
OpenAlexW4391522137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.